Beyond Oil and Gas

5 minutes

Beyond Oil and Gas

Mapping the New Faces of In-House Legal Hiring in Energy 

Energy's legal hiring footprint is bigger than people assume

Ask most people to picture an in-house lawyer working in energy, and they'll likely imagine someone inside a major oil and gas company, or perhaps a large utility. That picture made sense for a long time though idoesn't reflect the market as it exists today. 

The energy transition has created an entirely new set of employer types, each with legal needs that look quite different from the traditional energy majors. Some of these businesses barely existed a decade ago. Many are still working out what their legal function should look like. The combination of legal complexity, paired with organisations actively shaping their own approach to it, is what makes this such an interesting part of the market right now, whether you're building a team or considering joining one. 

Let's looks at some of the less obvious corners of the energy sector generating legal hiring activity, what makes the legal work in these businesses distinctive, and what that means both for employers building teams and for senior lawyers weighing where to take their careers next. 

What's driving legal hiring across energy right now 

The headline drivers are well rehearsed: net zero commitments, energy security concerns following the disruption of European gas supply, and a sustained wave of capital moving into renewables and supporting infrastructure. What's less discussed is how unevenly that activity is distributed. A lot of it isn't happening inside generation businesses at all, it's happening in the layer of specialist companies that exist to make renewable energy usable: connecting it to the grid, storing it, balancing it, trading it, financing it. 

That layer is where a lot of the more interesting legal hiring is currently concentrated, partly because it's less mature and partly because it sits at the intersection of several disciplines at once, land, infrastructure, regulation, and commercial contracting, rather than any single one of them. 

The energy niches beyond the obvious 

Four examples illustrate the range well. 

The first is a business operating in "last-mile" grid connectivity:
Effectively the link between new renewable generation projects and the electricity grid itself. It's not a part of the sector that gets much public attention, but it's become one of the genuine bottlenecks in the UK's renewables build-out. Connection queue reform, driven by Ofgem and the National Energy System Operator, has made this an increasingly active area, and businesses solving for it have attracted significant investor confidence as a result, the business in question has raised in excess of £500 million to fund its growth. The legal work here sits close to real estate and infrastructure: land rights, wayleaves, easements, and connection agreements with Distribution Network Operators, layered on top of the commercial and corporate work you'd expect from a fast-growing business. 

The second is an energy-from-waste specialist:
A sector that doesn't naturally come to mind under the "renewables" banner but sits squarely within it, converting non-recyclable waste into power and heat. We recently supported this business with a senior in-house hire, and the legal profile is a useful illustration of how broad these roles tend to be: environmental permitting under the UK's Environmental Permitting Regulations, planning and consenting for processing facilities, long-term waste supply and gate fee arrangements with local authorities, and the general commercial law that comes with running an operational business at scale. 

The third is a hydrogen business, where we recently placed the General Counsel:
Hydrogen remains one of the earliest-stage parts of the renewables landscape, even the basic taxonomy is still bedding in, with green, blue and pink hydrogen carrying different production methods and different regulatory treatment, and support mechanisms like the UK's Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard and hydrogen business model still relatively new. That means the legal function is often being built from close to nothing, covering everything from electrolyser procurement and construction contracts to early-stage offtake agreements. It's a very different proposition to joining an established energy business with a mature legal playbook already in place, and it tends to appeal to a particular kind of candidate: someone comfortable with ambiguity and keen to shape a function rather than step into one. 

The fourth, which we're seeing increasingly, is battery storage and flexibility:
Businesses that store surplus renewable power or help balance the grid at moments of peak demand. As more intermittent generation comes online, storage and flexibility have gone from a niche add-on to a commercial necessity, and the legal work reflects that: grid connection and curtailment arrangements, revenue stacking across multiple markets (including the Balancing Mechanism), and increasingly, the corporate and project finance structures needed to fund large-scale storage assets. 

Beyond these four, the same pattern is showing up across other corners of the transition. EV charging infrastructure businesses face many of the land and grid connection questions of last-mile connectivity, layered with consumer-facing regulation around metering and billing. Floating offshore wind, still pre-commercial in the UK but moving quickly, is generating novel legal questions around seabed leasing, marine consents, and mooring arrangements that don't yet have settled precedent. Virtual power plants and demand-side aggregators, businesses that bundle rooftop solar, batteries and smart appliances into a single tradeable resource, are testing the edges of existing electricity market rules faster than those rules are being updated. And carbon capture and storage, underpinned by UK government track allocations, is starting to generate early-stage legal hiring built around long-term transport and storage agreements and cross-border liability questions still being worked through. 

None of these sectors would typically appear on a shortlist of "energy employers" drawn up by someone outside the industry. All of them are hiring senior legal talent for genuinely complex, multi-disciplinary roles. 

Why these roles are legally distinctive

Across these examples, a few common threads stand out. Land is a recurring theme; acquiring rights, negotiating options, and managing the interface between private landowners and public infrastructure, which is a very different skill set to most commercial legal work. Planning and consenting processes are often central rather than peripheral: larger projects may fall under the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects regime and require a Development Consent Order, while smaller ones sit within ordinary local authority planning, each with its own timeline, risk profile, and stakeholder dynamics. Grid connection agreements bring their own specific technical and commercial considerations, as do power purchase agreements, whether structured as corporate PPAs or sleeved arrangements through a licensed supplier. And underneath all of that sits the layer of "ordinary" in-house work, corporate, commercial, employment, data, that any growing business needs covered. 

It's this combination that makes energy legal roles harder to categorise than they first appear. A lawyer coming from a traditional energy or utilities background may have deep experience in regulatory and commercial work but limited exposure to land and infrastructure. A real estate or construction lawyer may have the opposite gap. Very few candidates arrive with the full spread already in place, which has a direct bearing on how these roles tend to be structured and filled. 

What this means in practice 

For businesses at this stage, the practical implication is usually that the search is for a strong commercial generalist who can pick up the specialist elements, land, infrastructure, regulatory, rather than a narrow specialist in any one of them. Legal teams tend to be small relative to the scope of what they're managing, so the person needs to operate independently across a wide brief rather than lean on a broader team structure. 

For senior lawyers considering a move, this is a part of the market worth taking seriously even if it doesn't look like an obvious next step from a traditional energy or infrastructure background. The breadth of these roles, and the fact that legal frameworks in areas like hydrogen and grid connectivity are still being worked out in real time, means there's genuine scope to shape how a function operates, something that's harder to come by in more established parts of the energy sector. It's a different kind of opportunity to a traditional GC role, and one that tends to suit people who are drawn to building rather than maintaining. 

A market worth understanding properly 

Energy is often talked about as if it's one sector with one set of legal needs. In practice, it's better understood as a collection of quite different businesses, some decades old, some barely five years into existence, each shaped by different regulatory frameworks, different stages of maturity, and different ideas about what "legal support" should look like day to day. 

That's part of what makes it worth spending time in properly, rather than treating it as a single homogenous market. The businesses solving the less visible problems: connecting projects to the grid, storing power, turning waste into energy, building a hydrogen economy from scratch, are often where the most interesting legal hiring is happening, and where the right hire can have an outsized impact on a small team. It's an area I'll continue to write about as it develops, and one I'm always glad to talk through with anyone building or considering a move within it.

Related Articles:

How Global Economic Conditions Shape Legal Hiring

Remote In House Legal Jobs

Breaking Into and Building In House Sports Legal Teams